Peers challenge government over pub ban powers in Sentencing Bill debate

During the Second Reading of the Sentencing Bill in the House of Lords on 12 November 2025, government ministers faced questions over proposals to expand court powers to impose “pub bans” as part of sentencing reforms. The hospitality sector’s concerns over enforceability, proportionality, and unintended consequences were echoed by several peers, prompting calls for greater clarity and safeguards.

The Sentencing Bill, introduced earlier this year, aims to modernise sentencing practices and reduce pressure on the prison system by expanding community-based penalties, earned progression schemes, and judicial discretion. Among its provisions is a new power enabling courts to ban individuals from licensed premises—such as pubs, bars, and nightclubs—if their offence is deemed alcohol-related.

This measure has sparked concern across the hospitality industry warning that the proposals risk placing undue enforcement burdens on licensees and could lead to confusion over who is responsible for monitoring compliance.

During the debate, several peers questioned the practicality of enforcing pub bans and the potential for disproportionate impact on individuals and businesses. Lord Paddick, a former senior police officer, asked whether licensees would be expected to act as de facto enforcers of court orders, and whether any guidance or support would be provided.

Baroness Finlay of Llandaff raised concerns about the scope of the bans, noting that not all alcohol-related offences occur in or near licensed premises. She urged the government to ensure that bans are targeted and proportionate, and not used as a blanket deterrent.

Lord Foster of Bath highlighted the risk of inconsistency, pointing out that without a national register or clear signage requirements, enforcement could be patchy and unfair. He called for a review mechanism to assess the effectiveness and fairness of pub bans once implemented.

The Bill’s broader reforms—including changes to driving bans and taxi licensing—have also drawn scrutiny, with stakeholders calling for joined-up thinking across regulatory frameworks.

Responding to the debate, Lord Timpson, Minister of State at the Ministry of Justice, defended the proposals as part of a wider effort to reduce reoffending and protect public safety. He acknowledged concerns about enforcement and pledged to work with stakeholders to develop practical guidance.

The Bill will now proceed to Committee Stage, where peers are expected to table amendments addressing pub bans, licensing implications, and proportionality safeguards.